Skip to main content

Does an Estate Under Judicial Settlement File Its Own BIR Income Tax Return?

Yes. While an estate remains under judicial settlement — meaning a court-supervised probate or administration is still open — it is treated as a separate taxable entity for any income it earns, such as rent, interest, or business income. That annual income tax is reported on BIR Form 1701, and it is entirely distinct from BIR Form 1801, the one-time estate (transfer) tax filed on the value of the decedent’s estate itself.

See How BIR Online Tools Simplifies Filing FREE →

Estate Income Tax vs Estate Transfer Tax — Not the Same Thing #

These are two different taxes on two different things, and confusing them is the most common mistake heirs and administrators make. Estate (transfer) tax, reported on BIR Form 1801, is a one-time 6% levy on the net value of what the decedent left behind. Estate income tax, reported on BIR Form 1701, is a recurring annual tax on income the estate itself generates while it is still being settled.

BIR Form 1801 (Estate Tax)BIR Form 1701 (Estate’s Annual Income Tax)
What it taxesThe net value of the decedent’s estate (the property itself)Income the estate earns during administration (rent, interest, business income)
When it’s filedOnce, within one year of the decedent’s date of deathAnnually, by April 15 of the year following each taxable year the estate remains under settlement
Who files itExecutor, administrator, or heirs, on behalf of the estateThe court-appointed administrator or executor, using the estate’s own TIN
Legal basisNIRC Section 84, as amended by the TRAIN Law (RA 10963)NIRC Sections 60-66 (Title II, Chapter X — Estates and Trusts)

A single estate can owe both: BIR Form 1801 once for the transfer of the decedent’s wealth, and BIR Form 1701 every year the settlement drags on and the estate’s assets keep producing income.

When Does an Estate Need Its Own TIN and ITR #

An estate needs its own Taxpayer Identification Number and annual income tax return the moment it starts earning income while still under administration or judicial settlement — separate from the TIN the decedent used while alive and separate from any heir’s personal TIN. This obligation comes directly from the Tax Code’s treatment of estates as taxable persons in their own right during this window.

Section 60(A) of the National Internal Revenue Code (Title II, Chapter X — Estates and Trusts), as reproduced in secondary legal-tax commentary (Tax and Accounting Center, Inc.), states:

“The tax imposed by this Title upon individuals shall apply to the income of estates or of any kind of property held in trust.”

That provision covers, among others, income received by estates during the period of administration or settlement — which is precisely the situation of an estate whose will is being probated or whose heirs are contesting distribution in court. Because the estate is taxed “upon individuals,” it computes its taxable income the same way a self-employed individual would, and it uses BIR Form 1701 — the same form used by mixed-income individuals, estates, and trusts, as distinguished from Form 1701A or Form 1702 in the BIR Form 1700 vs 1701A vs 1701 vs 1702 comparison.

How the Estate’s Taxable Income Is Computed (Worked Example) #

The estate’s taxable income is computed exactly like an individual’s: gross income earned during the year, minus allowable deductions, taxed at the graduated rates under NIRC Section 24(A) — with no separate lower rate schedule just because the taxpayer is an estate rather than a person.

Consider the estate of Mr. Reyes, whose will is undergoing judicial probate. The court-appointed administrator manages three rental properties that belonged to Mr. Reyes, and while the estate remains unsettled, those properties earn ₱600,000 in rental income for the year.

  1. The administrator secures a separate TIN for the estate at the Revenue District Office with jurisdiction over the decedent’s last residence — this TIN is distinct from Mr. Reyes’s personal TIN and from any heir’s TIN.
  2. The estate deducts allowable expenses the same way an individual landlord would: real property tax on the rental units, repairs and maintenance, and reasonable administration fees paid to the administrator.
  3. Assume allowable deductions total ₱150,000, leaving net taxable income of ₱450,000 for the year.
  4. The administrator applies the graduated income tax rates under NIRC Section 24(A) to that ₱450,000, the same rate schedule an individual taxpayer would use.
  5. The administrator files BIR Form 1701 on behalf of the estate by April 15 of the following year, and pays the tax due — separately from any heir’s own personal income tax return, which reports only that heir’s individual income, not the estate’s rental income.

If, the following year, the court finally approves distribution and the three properties are transferred into the heirs’ names, rental income earned from that point forward is taxed to each heir individually on their own personal returns, not to the estate.

When the Estate’s Separate Filing Obligation Ends #

The estate’s status as a separate income taxpayer is not permanent — it exists only for as long as administration or judicial settlement is open, and it ends the moment the court approves final distribution of the estate’s assets to the heirs. Once that happens, income the formerly-estate-held property generates reverts to being taxed directly to whichever heir now owns it.

This makes the length of the judicial settlement itself the practical driver of how many years BIR Form 1701 must be filed for the estate. A settlement that drags on for several years due to contested heirs or a complicated probate means several years of separate BIR Form 1701 filings for the estate — each one covering only the income earned that year while administration was still open.

Judicial vs Extrajudicial Settlement: Why It Matters Here #

This separate annual income tax filing obligation is tied specifically to estates going through court-supervised administration, not to every estate settlement. A judicial settlement arises when the decedent left a will requiring probate, or when heirs cannot agree and a court must supervise the division of assets — and it typically takes considerably longer than an out-of-court process.

An extrajudicial settlement, by contrast, happens when heirs agree among themselves (often via a notarized deed of extrajudicial settlement) without ongoing court administration. Because there is no court-appointed administrator managing estate property over an extended period, income the property generates typically flows to the heirs individually much sooner, without the same extended stretch of estate-level BIR Form 1701 filings that a contested or will-based judicial settlement can require.

Summary #

An estate under judicial settlement is a separate income taxpayer for as long as administration remains open: it gets its own TIN, computes taxable income the way an individual would under NIRC Sections 60-66, and files BIR Form 1701 annually by April 15 on income like rent, interest, or business income the estate earns. This is entirely separate from the one-time BIR Form 1801 filed on the value of the decedent’s estate itself. Once the court approves final distribution, the estate’s separate filing obligation ends, and income from the distributed property is taxed to each heir individually — reported on whichever return fits their income mix under the BIR Form 1700 vs 1701A vs 1701 vs 1702 comparison.