↓Skip to main content

Can a Non-Mandated Taxpayer Voluntarily Enroll in BIR eFPS?

A taxpayer who doesn’t fall into any of the categories the BIR mandates into eFPS can generally still enroll voluntarily, through the system’s own online registration — the mandatory list in Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 9-2001 and its many amendments has never been the only door into eFPS. The regulations have historically carved out a voluntary track alongside the mandatory one, dating back to the system’s earliest rollout, though enrolling is a step worth thinking through rather than a reversible trial.

This guide covers where that voluntary option comes from, what a non-mandated taxpayer actually gains by enrolling, and why reverting afterward isn’t simple. For who is mandated into eFPS today, see Who Must Enroll in BIR eFPS?; for the fallback channel most non-mandated taxpayers already use, see eFPS vs eBIRForms: Which One Do You Need to File With?.

Prepare Your Filing Either Way FREE →

Where does the voluntary eFPS option come from? #

eFPS wasn’t designed purely as a mandatory system for large taxpayers — from its earliest amendments, the BIR built in room for smaller, non-mandated taxpayers to opt in on their own initiative. RR No. 9-2001 established the system and made it compulsory for BIR-classified Large Taxpayers, but subsequent regulations reflect a parallel voluntary track: an early amendment, RR No. 2-2002, extended the option to avail of eFPS to a batch of non-large taxpayers the BIR identified, rather than treating eFPS as closed to everyone outside the mandatory list.

That pattern — expanding the mandatory list while never closing the voluntary door — continued through RR No. 9-2002, RR No. 26-2002, RR No. 5-2004, RR No. 10-2007, RR No. 3-2009, and RR No. 1-2010, each of which widened who must use eFPS without removing the ability of a non-mandated taxpayer to register for it. RR No. 1-2010’s own official title, as indexed by the Supreme Court E-Library, captures the pattern of these amendments generally:

“AMENDING FURTHER SECTION 3 OF REVENUE REGULATIONS (RR) NO. 9-2001, AS LAST AMENDED BY RR NO. 10-2007, EXPANDING THE COVERAGE OF TAXPAYERS REQUIRED TO FILE RETURNS AND PAY TAXES THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC FILING AND PAYMENT SYSTEM (EFPS) OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE”

— Revenue Regulations No. 1-2010 (official title)

Each of these amendments is framed as expanding mandatory coverage — none of them is framed as restricting who may register voluntarily, which is why BIR’s eFPS enrollment page has continued to accept applications from taxpayers outside the mandated categories, subject to the BIR’s own processing and the taxpayer’s RDO confirming registration details are in order.

What does a non-mandated taxpayer actually gain or risk by enrolling? #

Voluntary eFPS enrollment trades the simplicity of eBIRForms-plus-a-payment-channel for a single integrated system — but it also commits the taxpayer to eFPS’s own filing habits and payment-channel requirements going forward.

ConsiderationeBIRForms (non-mandated default)Voluntary eFPS enrollment
FilingPrepare and submit the return through the Offline or Online eBIRForms PackageFile directly within eFPS
PaymentSeparate step: bank, AAB, GCash, Maya, or other accredited channelOften integrated with an enrolled payment bank, depending on tax type
Switching back laterN/A (already the default)Not routine — generally requires a request to the BIR rather than simply filing elsewhere next quarter
Best fitMost small and medium taxpayers with no mandatory categoryA taxpayer that wants one integrated channel, or expects to soon meet a mandatory category anyway (e.g., approaching the Top Withholding Agent threshold)

A business expecting to be designated a Top Withholding Agent soon, for example, may find it simpler to enroll in eFPS ahead of that designation rather than switching systems mid-year once the BIR publishes it on the mandatory list.

Worked example: a growing retailer considering voluntary enrollment #

Bataan Home Essentials, Inc. is not currently on any BIR mandatory eFPS list — it’s neither a Large Taxpayer nor a Top Withholding Agent, and it isn’t enrolled in TAMP. It currently files through eBIRForms and pays separately through its bank’s AAB counter each month.

The owner is considering voluntary eFPS enrollment because the company has grown steadily and the bookkeeper suspects it may cross the ₱12,000,000 Top Withholding Agent threshold within the next year or two, which would make eFPS mandatory anyway under RR No. 7-2019. Enrolling now, while the volume of filings is still manageable, lets the bookkeeper learn the system’s payment-channel requirements and build the habit of integrated filing-and-payment before the transition becomes mandatory and time-pressured. The tradeoff the owner accepts: once enrolled, reverting to eBIRForms isn’t a simple next-quarter decision if the integrated workflow turns out to be more cumbersome than expected for the company’s current size.

Summary #

The mandatory categories under RR No. 9-2001 and its amendments have never been the only way into eFPS — the regulations have consistently left room for a non-mandated taxpayer to enroll voluntarily, a track that traces back to RR No. 2-2002’s original 200-taxpayer pilot and has continued through every subsequent expansion. Enrolling makes sense for a taxpayer anticipating mandatory status soon or wanting one integrated filing-and-payment channel, but it is a commitment, not a trial — confirm your RDO’s current enrollment process and think through the payment-channel requirements before opting in, since reverting to eBIRForms afterward isn’t a routine switch.