↓Skip to main content

BIR Form 2307 for Online Course Creators and E-Learning Platforms: Who Withholds When a Platform Pays an Instructor?

Whether an online course creator ends up with a BIR Form 2307 depends on who’s paying and from where: a Philippine-registered e-learning platform paying a local instructor withholds EWT the same way a tutoring center or review center withholds on its instructors, while a foreign platform like Udemy, Coursera, or Skillshare generally isn’t a Philippine withholding agent at all. Getting this backward — assuming every course payout should come with a certificate, or assuming none ever will — is the most common confusion creators run into.

Generate This BIR Form 2307 FREE →

Why does the platform’s location decide the withholding question? #

A Philippine-registered platform paying a Philippine-resident instructor is a domestic transaction between two Philippine taxpayers, and the platform — as the payor — is the one responsible for withholding if the payment falls under a covered EWT category; a foreign platform paying the same instructor from outside the Philippines has no Philippine withholding obligation to begin with, because it isn’t a Philippine withholding agent. This is the same principle covered for freelancers generally in Do You Withhold Tax When Paying a Foreign Freelancer for Services Performed Outside the Philippines? — here it just runs in the other direction, from a foreign payor to a Philippine payee rather than the reverse.

PayorPayeePhilippine withholding?Certificate
Philippine e-learning platformLocal instructor/course creatorYes, if EWT-coveredBIR Form 2307
Foreign platform (Udemy, Coursera, Skillshare)Local instructor/course creatorNo — foreign payor, not a Philippine withholding agentNone
Philippine companyLocal instructor for an in-house corporate training courseYes, as a professional/talent feeBIR Form 2307

What rate applies when a Philippine platform pays a local instructor? #

A Philippine platform engaging an individual instructor directly for live cohort teaching, course facilitation, or curriculum development withholds at the same 5%/10% individual professional and technical consultant bracket under Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 11-2018 that applies to tutors and review center instructors — 5% if cumulative payments for the year stay at or below ₱3,000,000, 10% once they exceed it. The BIR’s own digest of RR No. 11-2018 describes the regulation’s scope this way:

“REVENUE REGULATIONS NO. 11-2018 issued on March 15, 2018 amends certain provisions of Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 2-98, as amended, to implement further amendments introduced by Republic Act (RA) No. 10963 (Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion [TRAIN] Law), relative to withholding of Income Tax.” This is the same bracket covered in BIR Form 2307 for Tutors and Review Center Instructors; an online platform running live or cohort-based instruction is functionally the same service relationship, delivered over video instead of in a classroom.

A corporate instructional design studio or training company organized as a corporation, rather than an individual instructor, is withheld at the corresponding 10%/15% bracket instead — the same individual-versus-corporate split that applies across every named-professional category in RR No. 11-2018.

Does pre-recorded course content get treated differently from live instruction? #

It can, depending on what the platform is actually paying for — a personal instructional service (live teaching, cohort facilitation, grading) generally reads as a professional fee subject to EWT, while a payment specifically for the right to reproduce and distribute the creator’s pre-made video content can be characterized instead as a royalty subject to final withholding tax. That’s a contract-specific classification question, not a blanket rule for “online courses” — the same kind of licensing-versus-service distinction this site works through for franchise fees in Is a Franchise Fee a Royalty or Ordinary Income?. A platform and creator should confirm which characterization their specific revenue-share or licensing agreement actually reflects, since the wrong one on either side under- or over-withholds.

Worked example: a Philippine platform’s cohort-based course #

A Philippine-registered online learning platform runs a 10-week cohort-based data analytics course and pays the individual instructor ₱150,000 for facilitating the cohort, grading, and office hours. Because this is a personal instructional service rather than a content license, and the instructor’s cumulative payments from this platform for the year remain under ₱3,000,000, the platform withholds at 5%.

ItemAmount
Instructor’s cohort facilitation fee₱150,000
EWT rate (individual, cumulative ≤ ₱3M)5%
Tax withheld₱7,500
Net paid to instructor₱142,500
Certificate issuedBIR Form 2307

Had the same instructor instead licensed a pre-recorded version of the same course to the platform for ₱150,000 with no live facilitation involved, the platform would need to confirm whether that payment is a royalty — subject to final tax on BIR Form 2306 instead — rather than defaulting to the EWT treatment used for the live cohort.

Frequently asked questions #

Does a Philippine e-learning platform withhold tax when it pays a course creator? #

Generally yes. A Philippine-registered platform paying a local instructor or course creator for content licensing, a cohort-based course, or a revenue-share arrangement is a withholding agent paying for a professional or contractor service, and withholds expanded withholding tax (EWT) the same way a tutoring center or review center withholds on its instructors, issuing BIR Form 2307 for the amount withheld.

Does Udemy or Coursera withhold Philippine tax on a Filipino instructor’s payout? #

No. Udemy, Coursera, Skillshare, and similar foreign-based platforms are not Philippine withholding agents, so a Filipino instructor’s payout from one of these platforms generally isn’t subject to Philippine withholding tax at source and won’t come with a BIR Form 2307. The instructor still reports that income on their own Philippine income tax return — the absence of a certificate doesn’t mean the income is tax-free.

What withholding rate applies to a local instructor paid by a Philippine platform? #

The same rate that applies to any individual providing a professional or technical service engaged directly by a business: 5% if the instructor’s cumulative gross income from that payor for the year is ₱3,000,000 or below, and 10% once it exceeds that threshold, under Revenue Regulations No. 11-2018’s professional/talent-fee bracket — the same bracket covered for tutors and review center instructors.

Is course content licensing treated as a royalty instead of a service fee? #

It can be, depending on how the arrangement is structured. If the platform pays for a license to reproduce and distribute the creator’s pre-made course content rather than for the creator’s personal instructional service, that payment may be characterized as a royalty subject to final withholding tax rather than EWT — a classification question similar to the one covered for franchise fees, and one worth confirming against the specific contract rather than assuming either answer.

Does a course creator registered under the 8% income tax rate still get withheld? #

Yes, in most cases. Electing the 8% income tax rate changes how the instructor computes their own income tax; it doesn’t exempt a Philippine platform from its separate obligation to withhold EWT as a payor on amounts it pays the instructor, the same way a client’s 2% or 5%/10% withholding continues regardless of the payee’s own income tax election.

Summary #

The withholding question for an online course creator turns on the platform’s location and what’s actually being paid for: a Philippine platform paying an individual instructor for live or cohort-based teaching withholds 5%/10% EWT and issues BIR Form 2307, the same bracket that applies to tutors and review center instructors, while a foreign platform like Udemy or Coursera generally withholds nothing at all because it isn’t a Philippine withholding agent. A payment for licensing pre-recorded content instead of live instruction may shift the classification to a royalty entirely. See BIR Form 2307 for Tutors and Review Center Instructors for the underlying rate bracket, and What Is BIR Form 2307 and When Must You Issue It? for the series’ starting point.